Software thats being sold thats been around for so long should at least function and have it's basic functions actually working. changes the colour on all profiles by the look too. However turn sharpening on with the interneg profile. This is a band-aid approach and prevents you from using colour correction or the colour profile of your film, VueScan has been around for a long time. ![]() The interneg profile however is working (it appears) for less "severe" negatives (ones where the clipping in vuescan is of smaller contiguous area rather than larger). Except the internegative profile as one user pointed out, software there is still some loss on the "severe" negatives (the negs are great themselves, no messing around in epson scan to see the detail, its not clipped while still being contrasty. None of the profiles or settings or exposure work against clipping because they apply post-cliping. There's a hard cut in the software.ĪS opposed to in Epson Scan, where this detail is actually there, without expanding the levels to a flat contrast, IE: it's not a huge contrast range of detail that I'm scanning, it's deciding to clip regular detail, in Epson Scan, detail is there, while being contrasty, I can expand the levels for a flat picture, but there is no more data, just empty histograms space, both dMin to dMax was contained in the smaller histogram area, expanding it more is a waste of bit space in the file. Yep, except when in VueScan using the tools to try and compensate for clipping makes ridiculously flat scans, while still clipping. I'm on 9.0.18 as noted in the opening post, which is the current version. ![]() I could use Epson Scan to scan a few times to files, then chuck those into a photoshop stack.really going to the effort though :/ The only reason I want to use VueScan is for A) Multi-pass scanning (awesome for a scanner like V500 that has horrid SNR) and B) The IR-dust removal, it does very well for itself, still leaves artefacts, not so bad though like Epson Scan does.Īll I want is reasonable 120 scans to display, given the difference between single and multipass results, noise but not grain has been an issue, any excellent images I can pay to have done on a Imacon. You should be able to set your own cut off points anyway. I even scanned as a positive at various exposure lock settings and correction settings (includin"none"), and it's still actually clipped once I get it into photoshop and look at properly.Ĭlipping is a deal breaker. Mendel: I've gone through everything, nothing has an effect on the clipping. I dont even need to expand the levels, because everything on the neg is in the usual place. never the less I should be able to decide where the clipping is.Įdward: Epson scan doesn't clip it. let me say my negs are completely normal :/. The RAW histogram doesnt appear to show any clipping. If Epson Scan had multipas-scanning to get rid of a lot o the noise for editing and for thin-ranged and also dense negs, and IR-dust removal as good as Epson Scan I wouldn't bother trying anything else. ones that Epson Scan pick up comfortably with expanding the density range too far. Happens to highlights ocassionally as well. Previewing each, R, G, B channel on the colour tab shows every single channel is flat black in her hair. It's not even that thin if Epson Scan is picking it up without having to expand the levels. VueScan is clipping it, and I can't do a single thing about it, gone through everything. If I preview it in Epson Scan, I dont even have to expand the levels, the detail is there - quite comfortably in the preview. It also isn't a problem with the scanner density. ![]() Does not matter what settings I use in VueScan, even with no colour balance, and locked to minimum exposure. Model has black hair, all contrast and detail in the hair is gone, clipped. VueScan is often clipping the shadows and both the shadows and highlights.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |